Three flavours of Astrolabe Sauvignon Blanc
|Astrolabe Sauvignon threesome|
Whilst I’m not strictly a Marlborough Sauvignon Blanc fan, I figure that the job of a good wine critic is to set aside any prejudices and just judge the wines on quality. Thankfully I’m not a good wine critic 🙂 but I don’t feel like I’m taking one for the team with this trio, as I believe that Marlborough Sauvignon Blanc does have merit, with the better wines (such as these three) entirely deserving of the attention.
These Astrolabe Sauvs give that ideal a fair shake, making for wines that I feel entirely comfortable recommending..
Astrolabe Voyage Sauvignon Blanc 2009 – $22
The entry level wine in the range and built to be approachable.
Whilst we are on the topic of personal preferences, the one thing I can’t stand is ageing herbaceous Sauvignon Blanc. That tinned asparagus and green pea character that many (cheaper) Marlborough Sauvs get after circa 12 months+ bottle time is my idea of wine hell (am I alone on this?).
But the Astrolabe Voyage doesn’t show any of that. It smells like it has just been squeezed into the bottle – fragrant, fresh and screaming ‘love me, I’m from Marlborough’.
Getting into specifics, it’s a fragrant and direct nose, showing bright passionfruit and faintly herbal/white flower aromatics. The palate is perhaps a bit broad and rounded for my tastes, sitting in the generous n’ juicy end of the spectrum and falling away a smidgen toward the tail.
Given the pricepoint and intention, you’d probably argue that this is just about right, even if it’s not for me. 16.5/88
Astrolabe Discovery Awatere Valley 2009 $25
A more channelled, subregional tilt at Marlborough Sauvignon Blanc, this is all about intensity and expression. Interestingly (it may have just been the glass), I noticed a fair bit more CO2 in the glass of this ‘Discovery’ Sauv, as if hinting at some more seriousness. The nose certainly shows the intentions, set much more herbal and drier than the Voyage, with much less opulence and more flint. It’s lightly floral too, with white flowers and currants (a character the winery tasting notes suggest and I think rings true). Palate is dry, long, linear and tangy, with both herbal and flinty bits. No shortage of length either, with a (still) quite juicy and rounded entry. Good stuff. Appreciable step up over the Voyage. 17.5/91
Astrolabe ‘Taihoa’ Sauvignon Blanc 2009 $36
Sourced from a vineyard at Kekerunga, this was hand picked, whole bunch pressed and wild yeast fermented in old oak.
Now this is my bag. Interestingly, I couldn’t help but think of the complex Lis Neris whites when tasting this, with both sharing that lovely, layered ‘oow I just tasted something else’ palate. I could imagine draining a bottle of the Taihoa with some sort of grilled salmon quite easily….
Lovely cream and herbs nose. Dill, chives and cream even, which made me think of smoked salmon blinis (without the fish). Regardless, it’s very attractive. The palate doesn’t dissapoint either, with levels and layers of sour, lemon (preserved lemons even) flavoured herbs and a beautiful, mandarin flavoured acid tang through the middle. The tang clicks through the finish and lingers beautifully too, cleaning up everything nicely.
As a wine this is nicely complex and interesting, with enough subtle savouriness to appeal to the sancerrophiles amongst us, whilst keeping it’s Marlborough undies on. Long, lemony and very good modern Marlborough Sauv. 18.1/93